Understanding is the new moat
Do you understand what you produced, and can you defend it when it's wrong?
Seoul is a vibe today
Accountability is more than I think it is
Proving what an agent did: my Future of Privacy Forum panel
The open question is who holds the record once the agent acts.
ICML: The call is from inside the model
The scientists and academics here are starting to work on judgment.
The evidence layer is empty: notes from the NYU fiduciary AI workshop
The duty stays with a human or a company, not the AI.
Your AI reviewed the contract. But you can't cross-examine a log
As agents start doing real legal work, we have no clean way to prove what they actually did
The lawyer who builds: governing AI from the inside
A lawyer whose raw material is judgment, who builds enough to make that judgment real, and who earns the right to govern a thing because he understands it from the inside
Legal has no Render Button
No engine runs a clause
